January 23rd, 2009, 01:54 am, waltz with Bashir *1/2, leave a comment. January 22nd, 2009, 07:03 am, inkheart leave a comment. January 22nd, 2009, 07:03 am, outlander leave a comment. January 22nd, 2009, 07:03 am, the secret Of The Grain *1/2, leave a comment. January 15th, 2009, 08:49 am, last Chance harvey leave a comment. January 15th, 2009, 08:49 am, defiance *1/2, leave a comment. January 15th, 2009, 08:49 am, notorious *1/2, leave a comment.
40 Hilariously mean Roger, ebert, reviews, thought Catalog
If i estimated the paid film has 10 minutes of dialogue, that would be generous." team America: World Police (2004) Ebert's full review Metascore: 64 ebert: 25 Users:.0 "like a cocky teenager who's had a couple of drinks before the party, they don't have. I prefer to be amazed by motivation, not manipulation." zoolander (2001) Ebert's full review Metascore: 61 ebert: 25 Users:.7 "There have been articles lately asking why the United editing States is so hated in some parts of the world. As this week's Exhibit A from Hollywood, i offer zoolander." Elsewhere on the web The Chicago sun-Times has a wealth of information about the man who spent 46 years there, including a tribute from Richard roeper. The response from Ebert's colleagues in the critic community has also been overwhelming, with tributes from the likes of Scott foundas (now at Variety michael Phillips of the Chicago Tribune, slates Dana Stevens, the. Clubs Scott Tobias, new York times critic. Scott, rolling Stone's Peter Travers, todd McCarthy of thr, alan Sepinwall of HitFix, james Poniewozik of Time, the huffington Post's mo ryan, and Kenneth Turan of the. Those are just a few of the hundreds of remembrances from friends and fellow critics. For video evidence of Eberts passion and influence, indiewire highlights a video of Ebert defending director Justin Lin at Sundance in 2002, /Film has a series of At the movies compilations, The Playlist includes a video of Siskel ebert discussing film criticism, and the. Times gathers a few clips from (where there are thousands more to choose from). Director Steve james promised to complete life Itself, a documentary on Eberts life that shares the title of his 2011 memoir, so fans can look forward to that. And Ebert's words should live on for quite some time.
And yet those very scenes of stark sexual despair are the tipoff to what's wrong with the movie. They're so strong that they deserve to be remote in a movie that is sincere, honest and true. But 'Blue velvet' surrounds them with a story that's marred by sophomoric satire and cheap shots. The director is either denying the strength of his material or trying to defuse it by pretending it's all part of a campy in-joke." Dirty dancing (1987) Ebert's full review Metascore: 65 ebert: 25 Users:.4 "The filmmakers rely so heavily on cliches, on stock. Let's say you're a big fan of the original comic book, and you think the move does it justice. You inhabit a world i am so very not interested." Napoleon Dynamite (2004) Ebert's full review Metascore: 64 ebert: 38 Users:.9 "There is a kind of studied stupidity that sometimes passes as humor, and Jared Hess' napoleon Dynamite pushes it as far. I'm told the movie was greeted at Sundance with lots of laughter, but then Sundance audiences are concerned with being cool, and to sit through this film in depressed silence would not be cool, however urgently it might be appropriate." The raid: Redemption (2012) Ebert's. Against many of those walls, heads are pounded again and again into a pulpy mass.
That makes them much more interesting." Watchmen (2009) Ebert's full review friend Metascore: 56 ebert: 100 Users:.6 "It's a compelling visceral film - sound, images and characters combined into a decidedly odd visual experience that evokes the feel of a graphic novel. It seems charged from within by its power as a fable; we sense it's not interested in a plot so much as with the dilemma of functioning in a world losing hope." The world Is Not Enough (1999) Ebert's full review Metascore: 59 ebert:. Some critics have treated it as ill-behaved, as if its originality is offensive. I celebrate these transgressions. 'yes' is alive and daring, not a rehearsal of safe material and styles." movies liked by most critics, disliked by Ebert Yes, there were some (fewer, but some) cases where everyone seemed to like a movie but Roger Ebert. Here are some notable examples from our database: Blue velvet (1986) Ebert's full review Metascore: 75 ebert: 25 Users:.9 Blue velvet' contains scenes of such raw emotional energy that it's easy to understand why some critics have hailed it as a masterpiece. A film this painful and wounding has to be given book special consideration.
The movie is a complete entertainment, a feast for the eyes and a delight for the fancy. It's a little amazing how Lucas and his associates keep topping themselves." The rock (1996) Ebert's full review Metascore: 59 ebert: 88 Users:.6 "A first-rate, slam-bang action thriller with a lot of style and no little humor." Spartan (2004) Ebert's full review Metascore:. Mamet's like a magician who gets you all involved in his story about the king, the queen and the jack, while the whole point is that there's a rabbit in your pocket." Stay (2005) Ebert's full review Metascore: 41 ebert: 88 Users:.3 "The ending. For a solution we have to think back through the whole film, and now the visual style becomes a guide. It is an illustration of the way the materials of life can be shaped for the purposes of the moment." Storytelling (2002) Ebert's full review Metascore: 50 ebert: 88 Users:.1 "I saw it a third time. By then I had moved beyond the immediate shock of the material and was able to focus on what a well-made film it was; how concisely solondz gets the effects he's after." The sum of All fears (2002) Ebert's full review Metascore: 45 ebert:. (2000) Ebert's full review Metascore: 48 ebert: 88 Users:.2 "Here's the animated space adventure i've been hoping for-a film that uses the freedom of animation to visualize the strangeness of the universe in ways live action cannot duplicate, and then joins its vision.
Eberts, kassel - restaurant, reviews, phone number photos
If he had a gun, he would shoot at the fascists. If he had an army, he would destroy them. He is a clown, and comedy is his weapon." Lost and Delirious (2001) Ebert's full review Metascore: 53 ebert: 88 Users:.4 "This is a movie for those who sometimes, in the stillness of the sleepless night, are so filled with hope and longing that. You know who you are." love actually (2003) Ebert's full review Metascore: 55 ebert: 88 Users:.1 "The movie's only flaw is also a virtue: It's jammed with characters, stories, warmth and laughs, until at times Curtis seems to be working from a checklist. It tells a full story with three acts, it introduces characters we get to know and care about, and it has something it passionately wants to say." Man on the moon (1999) Ebert's full review Metascore: 58 ebert: 88 Users:.9 "That Carrey can evoke. That he can suppress his own desire to please takes a kind of courage. Not only is he working without his own net-he's playing a guy who didn't use a net." Mystic pizza (1988) Ebert's full review Metascore: 60 ebert: 88 Users:.5 "The characters are allowed to be smart, to react in unexpected ways, and to be more.
" The passion of the Christ (2004) Ebert's full review Metascore: 47 ebert: 100 Users:.2 "This is not a sermon or a homily, but a visualization of the central event in the Christian religion. Take it or leave." Perfume: The Story of a murderer (2006) Ebert's full review Metascore: 56 ebert: 100 Users:.4 "This is a dark, dark, dark film, focused on an obsession so complete and lonely it shuts out all other human experience. You may not savor it, but you will not stop watching it, in horror and fascination." Pretty woman (1990) Ebert's full review Metascore: 51 ebert: 88 Users:.2 "It is astonishing that 'Pretty woman' is such an innocent movie - that it's the sweetest annotated and. As I wrote from Toronto: 'It is a movie about the theory and practice of two things: torture and personal responsibility. And it is wise about what is right, and what is wrong. return of the jedi (1983) Ebert's full review Metascore: 52 ebert: 100 Users:.2 return of the jedi' is fun, magnificent fun.
I.' but the look of the film is revolutionary. Final Fantasy is a technical milestone, like the first talkies or 3-D movies." The golden Compass (2007) Ebert's full review Metascore: 51 ebert: 100 Users:.1 "A darker, deeper fantasy epic than the 'rings' trilogy, 'the Chronicles of Narnia' or the 'potter' films. It springs from the same British world of quasi-philosophical magic, but creates more complex villains and poses more intriguing questions. As a visual experience, it is superb. As an escapist fantasy, it is challenging." The hunt for Red October (1990) Ebert's full review Metascore: 58 ebert: 88 Users:.7 "McTiernan, whose previous films were 'predator' and 'die hard showed a sense of style and timing in those movies, but what he adds.
Somehow we feel this is more than a thriller, it's an exercise in military and diplomatic strategy in which the players are all smart enough that we can't take their actions for granted." Jersey girl (2004) Ebert's full review Metascore: 43 ebert: 88 Users:.7. The characters remain believable; we have a conflict of personalities, not stereotypes. The action coexists seamlessly with the message." Kingpin (1996) Ebert's full review Metascore: 43 ebert: 88 Users:.5 "Some of the gags don't work, and yet I laughed at the farrellys' audacity in trying them. And the humor isn't just gags and punch lines, but one accomplished comic performance after another." Knowing (2009) Ebert's full review Metascore: 41 ebert: 100 Users:.1 "Knowing is among the best science-fiction films i've seen - frightening, suspenseful, intelligent and, when it needs. It is a surprisingly touching movie with the same kind of emotional arc as 'Awakenings'." The last Samurai (2003) Ebert's full review Metascore: 55 ebert: 88 Users:.4 "beautifully designed, intelligently written, acted with conviction, it's an uncommonly thoughtful epic. Its power is compromised only by an ending that sheepishly backs away from what the film is really about." leaves of Grass (2010) Ebert's full review Metascore: 58 ebert: 100 Users:.9 "Some kind of sweet, wacky masterpiece." The legend of Bagger Vance (2000) Ebert's. And Benigni isn't really making comedy out of the holocaust, anyway. He is showing how guido uses the only gift at his command to protect his son.
Frida, kahlo, draw my, life
The experience of the movie is joyous.". The big Kahuna (2000 ebert's full review, metascore: 56, ebert: 88, users:.0 "Sharp-edged, perfectly timed, funny and thoughtful. Spacey and devito are two of the smartest actors in the movies, filled with the joy of performance, and they exchange their dialogue with the precision of racquetball players.". Blade ii (2002 ebert's full review, metascore: 52, ebert: 88, users:.2 "you can sense the difference between a book movie that's a technical exercise resident evil and one steamed in the dread cauldrons of the filmmaker's imagination." a christmas Carol (2009) Ebert's full review word Metascore. It's getting from one moment to the next that is tricky. Surely this is one of the most ambitious films ever made." The contender (2000) Ebert's full review Metascore: 59 ebert: 100 Users:.9 "One of those rare movies where you leave the theater having been surprised and entertained, and then start arguing." everything Is Illuminated. The first time i saw it, i was hurtling down the tracks of a goofy ethnic comedy when suddenly we entered dark and dangerous territory. I admired the film but did not sufficiently appreciate its arc." field of Dreams (1989) Ebert's full review Metascore: 57 ebert: 100 Users:.1 "This is the kind of movie frank capra might have directed, and James Stewart might have starred in - a movie.
"you're a barista 5-star site living in a 4-star world!" he told. . Of course, he was right on the money, and we made the change. Roger will be missed. Movies liked by Ebert and users, but disliked by most other critics. Here is a sampling of the many films—both mainstream crowd-pleasers and more obscure titles—where Ebert was in the minority for expressing a positive opinion: films where he graded three and a half stars (the equivalent of 88) or higher, but the metascore was. All"s come from his reviews; note that Metacritic user scores are on a 0-10 scale instead of a 0-100 scale. (And Ebert's scores are straight conversions of his star grades, where a full 4 stars 100, 3 stars 75, etc.). Across the Universe (2007 ebert's full review, metascore: 56, ebert: 100, users:.4 "Here is a bold, beautiful, visually enchanting musical where we walk into the theater humming the songs. The beauty is in the execution.
Ebert's opinions were much closer to scores given by metacritic users than to those provided by other professionals. In both his grades and his writing, it seems, Ebert was able to speak both to and for the average movie fan, perhaps more so than his contemporaries. Fittingly, the new York times obituary for Ebert is headlined. A critic for the common Man. Examples of cases where Ebert and his fellow critics strongly disagreed are listed below. "you're a 5-star site living in a 4-star world!" —roger Ebert, to metacritic, before we get there, a personal note: Roger was a friend our ours, and a great friend and supporter of Metacritic over the past dozen years. We will greatly miss his encouraging emails. Very early in our development, roger reached out to us to make a few specific recommendations on how we could improve our scoring system. For example, we originally used a single-digit scoring system for critic scores in our movies section, which forced us to round his 3-star scores to 8 instead of listing the much more accurate.
According to our statistics, those star grades were higher than those of his colleagues 75 of the time. Similarly, three out of every four Ebert reviews were positive—that's over 3,000 films in our database alone. His average grade was 71 (or nearly 3 out of 4 stars on his scale over 12 points higher than the typical critic's average score. But what might be considered grade inflation with another critic business came across, from Ebert's keyboard, as genuine enthusiasm and appreciation for the craft of movies. His tastes ran both broad and deep, and his endorsements carried more weight because his writing was always approachable while also revealing an extensive knowledge and love of film. He was the rare critic that was both populist and Pulitzer winner, impressed equally by stunning, effects-heavy visual spectacles and more cerebral, dialogue-heavy affairs like the works of neil labute and Todd Solondz (two among the many indie filmmakers whose films he often praised). Judging from the response to his death last week, few critics over the past 30 years have influenced as many people. Not only was Ebert a truly invaluable supporter of smaller films that might not otherwise get noticed, but he influenced a new generation of writers to enter the field of film and television criticism. (For reactions from the critic community, see our roundup at the bottom of this page.).
Senate races 2018
Popular Film Critics; Roger Ebert gene siskel review Jaws the revenge in a great debate of Film, legs Art, dialogue and production! Comment subscribe, and give us a two thumbs up below requesting. Reviews you would like to see from our vault! Jaws screen reader - best in Cl, jaws von Freedom Scienti, jaws (film) - wikipe, jaws downloads - freedomscientific., jaws (1975) - i, m: Jaws: a novel, jaws (1975) - rotten Tomat, jaws used Office, jaws, jones and Wagener - h, page: jaws the revenge. Many thumbs up, roger Ebert, 19422013, while his thumb would occasionally shift into the "down" position, there's no getting around the fact that Roger Ebert was a lenient grader. The longtime Chicago sun-Times film critic, who died last week at the age of 70 after a battle with cancer, used a four-star grading scale in his written reviews (as opposed to the binary thumbs up/down system that he and fellow critic Gene siskel made. At the movies broadcasts).