By being at home all the time, the child is sheltered from the real world and are not presented with opportunities for question, debate, or a maybe even an alternate viewpoint. The classroom offers a chance to hear different ideas, questions, interaction, and discussions(Romanowski, 2005). When being home schooled, the child can only hear the views of their parents. There are online courses the child can take, but they will never be able to experience a heated discussion. These are qualities that cannot be obtained at home. Along with the socialization, the child does not encounter diversity. A child does not interact with diversity in their home, unless they are on a computer.
Toefl essay : do you like to eat out or at home?
Keeping your child at home will not only reduce the risk, but keep them away from the exposure as well. This is home schooling motivated by fear. The case Against Home School edit, qualification edit. An argument against homeschooling is the qualification of the teacher. First of all, is the parent even qualified to teach children? According to romanowski (2001 ten states require that a parent who teaches their child have a high the school diploma or equivalent. Does that mean that some parents do not have to have a high school diploma? This creates many question regarding professionalism, organization, and the teaching skills to teach their children properly and efficiently(Romanowsk, 2005). Teaching is a big essay responsibility and children deserve the best. Socialization edit, social concerns are one of the main disadvantages. A child needs to develop social skills and interact with their peers in order to succeed in life and be prepared for the real world.
Also, the children may practice religion throughout the day without getting in trouble or being criticized. Pedagogues edit, contrary to the ideologues, parents are not concerned with what is taught, but how the information is presented. In other words, they believe that whatever public schools teach, they teach ineptly(Romanowski, 2005). Pedagogues also include parents of special needs children that were not receiving what they consider to be appropriate care and education for their children. Pedagogy and special needs are the growing motivator for parents to begin home schooling (Green 2007).Teachers in the school systems are not able to look at their particular child and teach them the unique teaching style that would suit them the best. In result, home schooling will allow the parent to focus on what the childs best online learning strategy is and focus on their needs. This also gives the parent the freedom to create the curriculum and pace throughout the day. The dangers edit, parents would rather teach their children at home in order to keep them safe. These dangers include: bomb threats, drugs, large classrooms, cliques, peer pressure, bullies, etc.
The movement has pushed more and more parents to teach their children at home, instead of with at school. Contents, why Choose home School? Edit, ideologues edit, parents in this category believe that the school system is not teaching what needs to be taught, for lack of better words. Today, the school system is trying to steer away from religious acts because of the growing diversity in the classroom. While most parents support this, others are outraged because they are not teaching religious values and character entry development. There becomes further difficulty with the teaching of such things as evolution or even dinosaurs because it goes against the beliefs of certain religions. A family has certain beliefs, values, and skills that they believe their children should learn. The religious belief seems to be the most influential problem when taking a child out of school and into their own home. "75 of homeschool educators are conservative christians who stress Biblical values and doctrine for their children and tend to believe that public schools are not able to teach the values they want their children to learn." (Green 2007) The school system does not practice.
According to the webster's dictionary, home schooling is the act of learning in your own home, not at an institute. Instead of riding a bus to school and being taught by a teacher, you are taught at home with the rules and regulations created by your parent. Usually the parent is the teacher, and they choose the curriculum, pace, and instruction of the childs learning. Home schooling is a rapidly growing process in the. The population of K-12 students has grown from 850,000 in 1993.1 million in 2003 (Green 2007). The movement was developed in the 1960s and 70s in order to?despise? Public school systems, and encourage parents to seek control over their childrens education and future (Collom 2005). Though the idea began in the 60s and 70s, home schooling was not legal in all 50 states until 1993 (Green 2007).
Eating, out to, eating at, home?
Lurie childrens Hospital of Chicago, and assistant professor of pediatrics and medical education at Northwestern University feinberg School of Medicine. Bauer, md, is biology a developmental pediatrician at Lurie childrens Hospital and assistant professor of pediatrics at Northwestern. Our team offers professional writing assistance to students across the globe. From high-school essays to PhD dissertations, we ensure that every paper you need is done to the highest standards of academia. What is the case against home schooling? Tommy and Sara are both second graders and they both live in the same neighborhood.
They get up every morning and attend school; however, they do not go to the same school. Tommy attends an elementary school nearby. He sits in a class with his fellow classmates, eats lunch with his friends, and plays on the swings during recess. When he comes home, he tells his parents business about what he learned and how his day went. Sara, on the other hand, is learning at home. She gets up, attends a teaching session with her mom, eats lunch with her family, and plays on the computer in her room. Why did her parents choose to teach Sara at home?
These choices create a new reality for women that is an amalgamation of work and personal lives, not an either-or-all phenomenon. Just as the practice of medicine involves making difficult choices when clinical outcomes are uncertain, so does the emerging picture of what women can be in medicine. Women should be told early that they will need to make sacrifices in every part of their lives to create that elusive balance. It doesnt mean you are doing something wrong, but doing something necessary. Womens lives have their own developmental stages. Some are about our careers, others are about caring for others.
Some life stages are about both of these at the same time. We should have the freedom to choose and not fight ourselves when moving from one to another or deciding to stay put. Most of all we need to stand behind our choices — to work, to stay at home, to have a family, to not have a family, to do both — and not be saddled with regret or anguish. Supporting one another in executing these choices should be the next mission of women in medicine, and the workplace in general. Only with this frame of mind and an open honest dialogue can we address the existing dearth of inequalities and female leadership in medicine and encourage women to stay in the game. Angira patel, md, is a pediatric cardiologist at Ann robert.
Eating, out, versus, eating
They are also chastised if they dont take enough time off. Take the write case of Marissa meyer, the ceo of Yahoo, who was criticized in the media this spring for not taking an writings appropriate amount of maternity leave and returning too soon to her high-powered position. To be sure, women have made significant strides toward equality in medicine. Men also struggle with balancing their roles as parents and physicians. Navigating work and life is difficult for women and for men. Both make personal decisions to leave medicine or decrease the time they spend practicing it for many reasons, and these reasons are right for them. Perhaps one legacy of the womens movement is the opportunity to choose the way we construct our lives with work and family.
We (and those who have supported us along the way) voluntarily make emotional, physical, and financial sacrifices to become physicians. But we may also choose to take a step back to raise families. Neither are insignificant decisions. But it shouldnt be one that is judged — implicitly or explicitly — by others who dont understand each persons individual journey. Anne-marie slaughter generated a national conversation about this phenomenon in her 2012 essay in the Atlantic, in which she describes the journey of raising a teenager while maintaining a demanding position as the first female director of policy planning in the us state department. She argued that equal opportunity for women at work does not exist. In fact, it cannot exist without significant talent policy changes that support work-life balance. Women are judged if they take off too much time from work.
problem. We were raised by mothers and grandmothers who encouraged us to believe we could be whatever we wanted and could do it all. We benefit from the sacrifices of women who came before us and fought for equal rights at home and at work. As we progress in our careers and personal lives, though, the reality of what we are experiencing is at odds with the messages of prior generations. Todays messages for women — in what they read and in their daily interactions at work — are muddled, full of judgment, and confusing. Female physicians cant have it all,. Karen siebert once wrote in the new York times. Medicine shouldnt be a part-time interest to be set aside if it becomes inconvenient; it deserves to be a lifes work, she claimed.
Despite their numbers, women hold a minority of leadership positions. Across all academic fields, 14 percent of department chairs are female. In pediatrics, with a higher percentage of female physicians, only 25 percent are female. Access to medical school isnt the problem. Women now comprise 48 percent of medical school students in the United States. Experts have attributed this inequality to a variety of factors. These summary include a voluntary withdrawal from medicine (including academic medicine) or leadership positions, inherent power differentials and stereotypes that lead to decreased opportunities for leadership, and biological factors and responsibilities at home that foster the perception of decreased dedication.
At, home, essay by lucylu
Women won the majority of the. Medals at the rio olympics. Hillary Clinton is campaigning hard to become the countrys first female president. . This may suggest that we have finally arrived at the mythical finish line and having it all goal of the feminist movement. Even President Obama, a father of two girls, had something to add to the conversation in his recent article, this is What a feminist looks revelation like. But it doesnt feel as if we have arrived or that the proverbial glass ceiling has been shattered. The role of women at home and work remains highly politicized and steeped in stereotypes. This tension plays out in a unique way in academic medicine, particularly pediatrics, where women comprise more than 57 percent of pediatricians and 70 percent of pediatric residents.