Case study: Little red Riding hood Let's go through an example: Little red Riding hood. How to begin The first thing we should ask is "What is Little red Riding hood about?" If you had one sentence to describe what it's about—not summarize it, just describe it—what would you say? Probably something like " Little red Riding hood is the story of a young girl's encounter with a dangerous wolf in the woods." This short summary would generally go in the lead of the article. Now that we have that, the next step is to figure out what the parts of that claim are that we're going to have to explain. There are three major ones—there's a young girl, a dangerous wolf, and an encounter. We're going to have to explain what all of those are. Establishing the premise we should start, probably, with the young girl—she does, after all, come first in our description and in the story. What is there to know about the young girl?
Hamlet, short, summary, hamlet starts with soldiers
The advantages of exhaustive coverage of the work are in dynamic tension with the desire to preserve dissertations the artistic qualities of the work for readers. 4 wikipedia should contain potentially "spoiling" detail where it substantially enhances the reader's understanding of the work and its impact, but be omitted when it merely ruins the experience of the work of fiction for our readers. Citations Citations about the work of fiction generally (that is, cites addressing the commentary, impact or other real-world relevance of the work) are secondary sources no different from citations of non-fictional topics. All interpretation, synthesis or analysis of the plot must be based upon some secondary source. Citations about the plot summary itself, however, may refer to the primary source—the work of fiction itself. For example, primary source citations are appropriate when including notable"s from the work, citing the act/chapter/page/verse/etc. Of the" within the work. For consolidated articles discussing a work published or broadcast in a serial form, a citation to the individual issue or episode is appropriate and should be included to help readers to verify the summary. Plot summaries written purely from other summaries risk excessive loss of context and detail. While consulting other summaries may be helpful in narrowing down on what the major plot elements are, be sure to consult the primary source material to make sure you get it right.
In the cases where we have articles on characters, locations, and other parts of a fictional work, we often have a section that amounts to a fictional biography. These sections are, essentially, just a different kind of plot summary. For online instance, an article on Hamlet the character as opposed to hamlet the play would just summarize prince hamlet's individual plot arc through the play. This works just like any other summary - again, you come up with a thesis statement, and defend it with evidence from the play. Perhaps you'd might begin the section with something like, "The play charts Hamlet's tragic downfall as he pursues revenge against his uncle Claudius and then you'd summarize the events that contribute to that tragic downfall, using all the same guidelines you would in general. Spoilers main page: wikipedia:Spoilers by the nature of being an encyclopedia covering works of fiction, wikipedia contains spoilers. It is traditional for wikipedia articles on fiction (including featured articles ) to summarize the work's plot in the section fairly early on (often immediately following the lead, though in other cases after a background section or list of characters and the actors who play. Information should not be intentionally omitted from summaries in an effort to avoid "spoilers" within the encyclopedia article. (Spoiler warnings were used early in the project, but the consensus of editors was that this practice was unencyclopedic so their use has been discontinued.) However, when summarizing a plot and choosing what details to include, editors should use descretion.
Similarly, if you find a summary that already overshadows the real-world information in the article, consider trimming it down to size. Maintenance over time having written a concise plot summary, authors must be wary of excessive attachment to their golden prose. At the same time, "plot bloat" is a serious problem. Plot bloat is the gradual expansion of a plot summary over time by well-meaning editors who do not have the advantage of the prior discussion about the preferred level of detail for this particular work. Periodic reviews and reassessments by new editors are essential to maintaining wikipedia articles and to maintaining plot summary sections in particular. For especially large or complex fictional works, certain elements may be split off into sub-articles per WP:SS. Such for related articles should be clearly cross-linked so that readers can maintain their understanding of the full context and impact of the work.
Wikipedia must not give undue weight to one perspective at the expense of others. A long and overly detailed plot summary that relies on the fictional work toward that single primary source and may lack the balance of coverage that can only be gained from secondary sources. Excessively detailed plot summaries may also infringe on copyright and fair-use concerns. See wikipedia:Plot-only description of fictional worksCopyright for more. As a rule, try to expand other sections of the article providing a real work perspective before adding to the plot summary. Our best fiction articles tend to have more real-world information than plot summary, not the other way around. If no more real-world information can be found then consider ommiting some details of the plot.
Hamlet ( short story ) tardis fandom powered by wikia
The three basic elements of a story are plot, character and theme. Anything that is not necessary for a reader's understanding of these three elements, or is not widely recognized as an integral or iconic part of the work's notability, should not be included in the story. Length There is no universal set length for a plot strange summary, though it should not be too excessively long. Well-written plot summaries describe the major events in the work, linking them together with fairly brief descriptions of the less important scenes or paraphrase dialog. While it is difficult to quantify a strict word limit since no two articles are equal, however, the wikipedia manual of style great offers some general recommendations to editors. The film style guideline suggests that "plot summaries for feature films should be between 400 and 700 words".
The tv style guideline recommends "no more than 200 words" for television episodes in episode lists, or "no more than 400 words" in standalone episode articles. The novels style guideline says that plot summaries "should aim to be no more than three or four paragraphs". The video game style guideline states "no more than approximately 700 words to retain focus". However, particularly complex plots may need a more lengthy summary than the general guidance. While longer descriptions may appear to provide more data to the reader, a more concise summary may in fact be more informative as it highlights the most important elements. By focusing the reader's attention on the larger structures of a plot, without drowning it in trivial detail, a shorter summary can often help the reader to understand a work much better than an overlong one. Some editors also feel that overlong plot summaries can pose a problems in terms of neutrality.
For example, to describe an alleged deficiency in a plot as a "gaping plot hole " expresses an opinion that cannot be included in wikipedia as if it were an established fact; it requires attribution to a source. In general, commentary is better suited to a themes or Reception section. What to cut Michelangelo is said to have created david by "taking a block of marble and cutting away everything that was not david." Writing a plot summary is a similar process—you take a long work, and you cut out as much as possible. The question is, what do you cut? The basic structure of many narrative plots includes a lengthy middle section during which characters repeatedly get in and out of trouble on their way to the climactic encounter.
Most episodes of Doctor Who, for instance, involve the main characters getting captured and escaping repeatedly in the middle portion of the adventure. Although such events are exciting to watch, they often clutter a plot summary with excessive and repetitive detail. Cutting less important ones can make the plot summary tighter and easier to understand. Necessary detail, however, must be maintained. A summary of Odyssey as "Odysseus, returning home from the Trojan War, has many adventures which he uses his wits to escape until he reunites with his wife and kills the men who were trying to take over his kingdom" would omit almost all. Even though they may know how the Odyssey ends, it's hard to say that they understand the work well enough to appreciate its context and impact. However, the Odyssey contains various scenes where people recount myths to each other, and other such scenes of little importance to the main plot. If most of these get left out, or mainly consist of a sentence or two, that is not a problem, and helps keep the focus on the main story. In works less vital to the foundations of academia and the founding of the western literary tradition, even more detail could safely be left out as unimportant, including entire lengthy subplots.
Hamlet, short, summary -riseNotes
For articles that do not have a dates dedicated cast section, as key characters are introduced in the plot of a film or play with a known cast, list the actors' names in parentheses after them, Character (. If it makes the plot much easier to explain, events can be reordered; for instance, a backstory revealed write later in a novel can be put first, or an in medias res opening scene of a film can be described where it would occur later. A nonchronological narrative structure can be made chronological; for some works of this nature, the original nonchronological structure of the plot is of interest to commentators, such as for Pulp Fiction or Memento. In these cases, it can be useful to include a brief out-of-universe summary to explain how the nonchronological narrative is presented in the work before presenting the chronological summary. Plot summaries should be written from the real world perspective by referring to specific works or parts of works In the first book "In Act ii or describing things from the author or creator's perspective the author introduces "The story describes. This gives the summary a more grounded tone and makes it more accessible to those unfamiliar with the source material. This section may contain commentary on the work, as in Candide, though this is not required and great care must be taken to avoid original research.
Wikipedia is not a substitute for the original. 2, how are plot summaries used on wikipedia? A plot summary is generally used to provide biography a concise description of the work in question, to allow the reader to understand the discussion related to that plot, and to illustrate points within an article. Where a specific plot point has been commented upon by academics or the media, it is necessary to describe that plot point. Ways of organizing a plot summary. The most common organization of a plot section is generally a self-contained section (designated by plot or sometimes synopsis ). By convention, story plots are written in the narrative present —that is, in the present tense, matching the way that the story is experienced. 3, provide a comprehensive plot summary.
is a case where secondary summaries may not be appropriate - a summary of a summary is less likely to be useful. Not only should a plot summary avoid a scene-by-scene recap, but there's also no reason that a plot summary has to cover the events of the story in the order in which they appear (though it is often useful). The point of a summary is not to reproduce the experience—it's to explain the story. If the original is nonlinear or experimental in its structure, then the article should state that fact in prose, not through regurgitation of the plot. 1, in fact, for a confusing story, we should assume that some of our readers will look the story up because they didn't understand. Just repeating what they have already seen is unlikely to help them. Do not attempt to re-create the emotional impact of the work through the plot summary.
The objective of a plot summary. The objective point of a plot summary is to condense a large amount of information into a short, accessible format. It is not to reproduce the experience of reading or business watching the story, nor to cover every detail. For those who have not read or seen the story, it should serve as a general overview that fills in on the major points. For those who have, it should be detailed enough to refresh their memory, no more. What plot summaries are not, a plot summary is not a recap. It should not cover every scene and every moment of a story.
Hamlet summary —
This page is not considered. Wikipedia guideline on wikipedia, but, mOS:plot and, mOS:fair use are. Whenever possible, the guidelines should be followed. But most importantly, the point is that plot summaries shouldn't swamp an article. As explained in, roles wikipedia:Plot-only description of fictional works, an encyclopedia article about a work of fiction frequently includes a concise summary of the plot. The description should be thorough enough for the reader to get a sense of what happens and to fully understand the impact of the work and the context of the commentary about. On the other hand, however, the plot summary must be concise because wikipedia's coverage of works of fiction should be about more than just the plot. Plot summaries that are too long and too detailed can also be hard to read and are just as unhelpful as those that are too short. Finding the right balance requires careful editorial discretion and discussion.